Some orders cost more than they pay. The five worth refusing, the three-sentence message that does it without insulting anyone, and what to offer instead.
Sailo team12 min read
"Can you do it for Saturday?" arrives on Thursday night, for a three-tier cake that takes you two days, and you already have four orders for that weekend. You know the answer. You type "let me check and get back to you" anyway, and then you spend Friday not sleeping about it.
Say no when the order costs more than it pays, when you can't do it properly in the time offered, or when the buyer has already shown you how the rest of this is going to go. Say it in three sentences, inside an hour, and offer one alternative. A ₦25,000 cake that eats a Saturday you'd have spent on three ₦12,000 ones is not a win, and neither is the version where you say yes and deliver something you're embarrassed by.
The rest of this is which orders to refuse, the exact wording, and the part almost nobody gets right, which is the timing.
Every refusal that works has the same shape. The no, one clause of reason, one alternative. Anything longer reads as an opening position, and a buyer who reads it as an opening position will negotiate.
Sorry, I can't take this one for Saturday. I'd need two full days for a three-tier and I've only got one. If the 14th works I can do it properly, otherwise I'd rather point you to someone who's free this weekend.
That's it. Three sentences, no apology paragraph, no explanation of your production schedule, no "unfortunately due to circumstances beyond my control".
The three parts each do a job:
What to leave out: the word "policy" when you mean "I don't want to", any sentence starting "as I'm sure you can appreciate", and every emoji you were about to soften it with. Softening a no makes it longer, not kinder.
Your lead time exists because you measured it once. An order inside it isn't a challenge, it's a promise you already know you might break.
I can't get it there by Tuesday. My cut-off for that week is Friday lunchtime and I'd be guessing otherwise. Next dispatch is Monday, arriving Wednesday or Thursday, if that still helps.
Notice what that does. It names a cut-off, so the buyer learns your system rather than your mood, and it gives the real arrival window instead of the best case. Promising the best case is how a no becomes a complaint eleven days later.
The order that flatters you is the one that costs you. Somebody asks whether you can do the thing in a different material, at triple the size, in a colour you've never mixed. You can probably work it out. That's not the question. The question is whether you can work it out for the price they'll accept, once, without a second attempt.
That's outside what I make at the moment. I've only worked in cotton and I'd be learning on your order, which isn't fair on either of us. If you want, I can do the same design in cotton for ₦9,000 and you'll get it in a week.
If you do want the job, price the learning in and say so out loud: "I've not done this exact thing before, so I'd want to make a sample first. That's ₦4,000 whether or not we go ahead with the full order." Half of them will say yes. The other half were going to be the difficult ones.
Not the person who asks for a discount. The person who agrees a price, then comes back and asks whether it can include delivery, then asks whether you'd do two for the price of one and a half.
Each request is small. The pattern isn't. A buyer who negotiates three times before paying negotiates after delivery too, and the after-delivery negotiation is called a refund request.
The price is ₦12,000 and delivery to Ikeja is ₦2,500. That's where I am on this one. Completely fine if it's not for you.
"Completely fine if it's not for you" is the most useful sentence in this article. It ends the negotiation without ending the relationship, and it's the one line that makes people who were testing you either pay or leave. Both are good outcomes.
Someone wants to pay half now and half in three weeks. Someone wants you to ship before the transfer clears because they're "sending it now". Someone wants to pay into a different account, or wants you to refund to a different account than the one that paid you.
That last one is the one to watch. A refund to a different account is the shape of an actual scam, and it arrives with a completely reasonable story attached.
I only ship once the payment's landed in my account, which I check myself. Nothing personal, it's just the rule I keep for everyone. As soon as I see it I'll pack it the same day.
If the deposit half of this is what you're wrestling with, the mechanics of taking part of the money up front are in taking a deposit before you start, and the specific case of the buyer who says the money's sent is in what to say when a buyer says they paid.
Fragile item going somewhere your courier is bad at. Fresh food travelling nine hours in June. A delivery date that depends on a supplier who has let you down twice.
You can take it and hope. Or you can say the true thing:
Honestly, I don't send these that far. Two of the last five arrived cracked and I'd rather not put you in that queue. If you're ever in Lagos I'll happily hold one for you.
Sellers assume this loses the sale and the reputation. It loses the sale. It builds the reputation, because you've just told a stranger something against your own interest, which is the only kind of statement people fully believe.
One email on pricing, photographs, delivery and getting paid. No pitch, no filler.
Refusing feels expensive because you can see the money you're turning down and not the money you're protecting. Put both on paper once.
| Order | What it pays | What it costs |
|---|---|---|
| Rush job, weekend, custom | ₦25,000 | Two days, four smaller orders you can't take, and a 50/50 chance of an apology |
| Learn-on-the-job custom | ₦18,000 | An unknown number of attempts, materials for each, and a product you can't reuse if they refuse it |
| Third renegotiation | ₦12,000 | Whatever they ask for next, plus the refund conversation |
| Long-distance fragile | ₦9,000 | Replacement plus postage twice, at roughly a one-in-three rate |
| A regular order | ₦12,000 | Ninety minutes and ₦4,000 of materials |
If a job pays double and costs quadruple, it isn't a big order, it's a small loss with a big number attached.
Do this for your own last ten awkward orders. Most sellers find two or three that lost money outright, and they're almost never the cheap ones. They're the ones where something was unusual and the price didn't change to match.
This is the part that matters more than the wording, and it's the part sellers get wrong.
A refusal before payment is a message. A refusal after payment is a refund, and on the rails most small sellers use, a refund is you, at your banking app, typing an account number back in by hand while somebody waits.
So the order of operations is: read the request properly, decide, reply. Not: accept, take payment, think about it overnight, unwind it.
Which means you have to be willing to leave a message on read for ten minutes while you check your calendar. Ten minutes is fine. Four days is what actually damages the relationship. The refusals that go badly are almost never the ones where you said no. They're the ones where you said "let me check" and then went quiet, and by the time you answered, the buyer had already told a friend it was sorted.
If money has already moved, you're no longer refusing an order, you're unwinding one, and that costs you both the transfer and the conversation about why you changed your mind.
Before you refuse, check whether there's a smaller version of the order you'd happily take. Most awkward requests are one variable away from being normal.
Offering the smaller version converts a surprising number of these, and it costs one extra sentence. What it must never become is a discount to make the awkward order palatable, because now you've taken the hard job for less money.
In a comment thread, somebody asks for something you don't do, and forty people are reading.
Answer briefly and publicly, then move it to DMs if it needs more.
Not doing custom sizes at the moment, sorry. Standard sizes are all in the shop link.
Short, no defensiveness, no explanation of why. The audience isn't reading for the reason. They're reading to see whether you're rude, and a one-line answer that isn't rude is all the evidence they need.
If it's already turned into an argument in public, the sequence for that is different, and how to handle an angry customer walks through the public-versus-private split properly.
Tomi bakes in Surulere and sells through Instagram and WhatsApp. A standard 8-inch cake is ₦12,000, a two-tier is ₦25,000, and she does roughly 18 cakes a month. Her lead time is five days.
For her first year she said yes to everything. Then she counted a bad month properly: 21 cakes, ₦268,000 taken, and three of those cakes had eaten two full days each because they were rush jobs with custom toppers. Two arrived late. One customer asked for half her money back and got it.
What she changed was not her prices. She wrote three saved replies on her phone and stopped negotiating in real time.
The rush reply, the custom-work reply, and the one she uses most, which is simply: "Completely fine if it's not for you."
Her refusal rate now runs at about one order in six. Revenue went up, because the Saturdays that used to hold one exhausting cake now hold three ordinary ones. Her month is now around 24 cakes and ₦290,000, and she finishes on Friday night instead of Sunday.
The thing she says she'd tell anyone starting: the orders she should have refused were all identifiable from the first message, and the tell was always the same. A question about the price and a question about the deadline in the same sentence, before any question about the cake.
Sailo shows your catalogue, holds your prices and turns a WhatsApp message into an order that arrives pre-written with the item, the options, the address and the total. That's genuinely useful for refusals, because a written request is easier to say no to than a voice note that lands while you're driving.
What it doesn't do is screen anybody. There's no buyer rating, no block list, nothing that stops the person you refused last month from ordering again next month. And on bank transfer or cash on delivery, Sailo never touches the money, so it can't hold a payment while you decide. It can't even tell you a transfer arrived. Only your bank can do that.
Which brings back the same rule from a different direction: decide before you take the money, because unwinding it afterwards is entirely manual work that lands on you.
The wider question of what makes a stranger comfortable enough to pay you in the first place is in building trust before money moves. And if the orders you're refusing turn out not to be real orders at all, dealing with fake orders and time wasters is the one to read next.
Open the notes app on your phone. Write three messages, each three sentences: the rush job, the custom job you don't do, and the price you're not moving on.
Then put them wherever your saved replies live, WhatsApp Business quick replies or an Instagram saved reply, so the answer takes four seconds instead of four days.
The next awkward request will arrive within a fortnight. You'll have the words ready, and the only thing you'll have to decide is which one to send.
Written by
Sailo team
One link, your whole shop.
One email on pricing, photographs, delivery and getting paid. No pitch, no filler.
Sailo just gives it a front door — so people can browse, compare and see prices before they message you.
Get your linkFree while in beta · No card required